作业帮头都大了,哪位大虾帮忙翻译一下!
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/07/07 10:52:08
头都大了,哪位大虾帮忙翻译一下!
每生产1.5Nm3氢氧混合燃气耗电4KW.h,而氧乙炔是由高耗电能的电石与水和丙酮制取,每生产1㎏电石,耗电3.6KW.h,生产1 Nm氧乙炔需电石4.4㎏,即生产1 Nm3氧乙炔耗电15.84KW.h.因此,氢氧燃气比氧乙炔及其它燃气可节省大量的自然资源和石化能源.同时,在切割过程中,氢氧焰燃烧强度高,火焰集中,与其它燃气比较,穿透力强,热影响区少,无挂渣现象,在相同工作效率下,比氧乙炔节约切割费用70—80%,比丙烷、丙烯等燃气节约切割费用50—70%,且割缝窄,减少金属损耗30—50%.
每生产1.5Nm3氢氧混合燃气耗电4KW.h,而氧乙炔是由高耗电能的电石与水和丙酮制取,每生产1㎏电石,耗电3.6KW.h,生产1 Nm氧乙炔需电石4.4㎏,即生产1 Nm3氧乙炔耗电15.84KW.h.因此,氢氧燃气比氧乙炔及其它燃气可节省大量的自然资源和石化能源.同时,在切割过程中,氢氧焰燃烧强度高,火焰集中,与其它燃气比较,穿透力强,热影响区少,无挂渣现象,在相同工作效率下,比氧乙炔节约切割费用70—80%,比丙烷、丙烯等燃气节约切割费用50—70%,且割缝窄,减少金属损耗30—50%.
将中文译成英语
Mixed gas to produce hydrogen power 1.5Nm3 4KW.h, and acetylene from calcium carbide and water, power-hungry energy and acetone extraction, to produce 1 kg of calcium carbide, power 3.6KW.h, production of 1 Nm oxyacetylene be 4.4 kg of calcium carbide, the production of 1 Nm3 oxyacetylene power 15.84KW.h. Therefore, the hydrogen gas than acetylene and other gas can save a lot of natural resources and fossil energy. Meanwhile, in the cutting process, the hydrogen flame burning high strength, flame concentration, compared with other gas, penetrating power, less heat affected zone, no dross phenomenon, in the same efficiency, than oxyacetylene cutting costs to save 70 -80%, compared with propane and propylene gas cost savings of 50-70% cut, and cut a narrow slit to reduce the metal losses of 30-50%.
Mixed gas to produce hydrogen power 1.5Nm3 4KW.h, and acetylene from calcium carbide and water, power-hungry energy and acetone extraction, to produce 1 kg of calcium carbide, power 3.6KW.h, production of 1 Nm oxyacetylene be 4.4 kg of calcium carbide, the production of 1 Nm3 oxyacetylene power 15.84KW.h. Therefore, the hydrogen gas than acetylene and other gas can save a lot of natural resources and fossil energy. Meanwhile, in the cutting process, the hydrogen flame burning high strength, flame concentration, compared with other gas, penetrating power, less heat affected zone, no dross phenomenon, in the same efficiency, than oxyacetylene cutting costs to save 70 -80%, compared with propane and propylene gas cost savings of 50-70% cut, and cut a narrow slit to reduce the metal losses of 30-50%.