英语翻译1 文章认为A能导致B,但是并没有排除其他原因导致B的可能性,这些其他原因包括C、D、E.当C、D、E存在时,原

英语翻译
1 文章认为A能导致B,但是并没有排除其他原因导致B的可能性,这些其他原因包括C、D、E.当C、D、E存在时,原文认为A导致B就显得站不住脚了.
2 作者得出的数据可能并不一定具有代表性,因为此数据不一定是在何时的时间、何时的地点用合适的方式调查合适的人群.而缺乏这些有效数据所得出的信息,显得无法得出文章中的结论.例如,如果这个结果涉及2000人,但之调查了20人；如果调查上班族,但调查时间竟是晚上；如果人群是白领,但是去了大学校园采访；如果适合调查的方式是一对一,而采用的却是填问卷,在这些情况之下,结论将会被怀疑.直到我们所有提到的问题通通被解决后,这个数据才能是perfect evidence来论证文章的结论.
3 作者形成结论是基于一个假设A,然而,文中没有任何证据证明这个假设是一定成立的,我们可以看到无数的反例BCD,当这些假设没有得到任何证据支撑时,贸然得出结论是武断的.
4 原文的结论要想成立,包含了以下几个方面,方面1,方面2,方面3,方面4,而在这几个方面中,显然方面1和方面2是最重要的,而这几个最重要的方面是否成立在文中并没有任何数据支撑.在没有充足证据证明这几个最重要的方面成立的情况下,得出原文的结论是不太适宜的.
5作者认为A能推出B显然太武断了.原文认为,因为A发生在B的前面,所以A能导致B,但是仅仅是时间上存在差异就认为A和B存在关系,是不正确的.除非有证据证明这两个事件存在必然因果关系,否则仅由于时间先后就认为A能推出B是比较武断且站不住脚的.
6 原文武断地认为A一定能导致B,但是原文中并没有任何证据证明B不可能导致A,例如：X.A发生在B前面,但不一定B导致不了A,除非我们能证明B确实导致不了A.否则认为A能导致B,A一定是因,B一定是果,就显得站不住脚了.
7 原文的结论认为：A和B在所有方面都类似,但是这个观点可能站不住脚,因为在A和B在对比过程中,我们会发现,虽然有一些相似之处,但是不相似之处也比比皆是.例如：不相似之处1,不相似之处2,不相似之处3,所以,由A类比出B,得出一个类似的结论,是不合时宜的.
8 作者认为,要么是A导致的文章的结论,要么是B导致的文章的结论,而并没有陈述是否存在中间状态的可能性,但是文章中确实存在中间状态的可能性.而生命中的大量体验都会告诉我们,不是A或B,而是A和B的结合往往能产生更加理想的效果.例如,2000年谈判双方A方想在增加销售量,B方想增加销售单价,导致双反不相认,但是两个结合也许能取得共赢.

1 articles that A can lead to B, but did not rule out other causes the possibility of B, these other causes include C, D, E. When the C, D, E exists, the original thought A leads to B is untenable.
2 authors derived data may not be representative, because the data does not have to be in when time, when locations in the right way to investigate the right people. Due to the lack of the effective data obtained information, is unable to draw the conclusion. For example, if the results of the survey involving 2000 people, but 20 people; if the survey work, but the investigation was night time; if the population are white-collar workers, but went to university campus interview; if suitable for investigating the way is one to one, and is filled with questionnaire, in these circumstances, conclusion be suspected of. Until we all mention of the problem was resolved after all, the data to perfect evidence to prove the conclusion.
3 authors to form conclusions are based on an assumption of A, however, in this paper, there is no evidence to prove this hypothesis is true, we can see hundreds of examples of BCD, when these assumptions are not any evidence to support, to draw the conclusion is arbitrary.
In 4 the original conclusion to establish, contains the following aspects, 1, 2, 3, 4, and in this a few aspects, apparently 1 and 2 are the most important, and it is the most important aspect is established in this paper and the absence of any data. In the absence of sufficient evidence to prove that it is the most important aspect of its situation, draw the conclusion is not suitable.
5 the A to launch B is too arbitrary. The text thinks, because A occurs in B front, so A can result in B, but only the time difference that A and B in the presence of relation, is not correct. Unless there is evidence that the two events in the presence of causal relationship, or just because of the time, that A can launch B is relatively arbitrary and untenable.
6 original arbitrarily think A can lead to B, but in the original text and no evidence of B may lead to A, for example: X. A occurred in front of B, but not B leads to A can not, unless we can prove that B did not cause A. Or that the A can result in B, A certainly is because, B must be fruit, is untenable.
7. Conclusion: A and B in all respects is similar, but this view may be untenable, because in the A and B in the comparison process, we will find that, although there are some similarities, but no similarities also meet the eye everywhere. For example : no similarities between the 1, no similarities between the 2, no similarities between the 3, so, by a ratio of B, come to a similar conclusion, is be inopportune or inappropriate.
The 8 authors, either A leads to the conclusion of the article, or B leads to the conclusion of the article, without the presence of the intermediate state of the possibility of statements, but the article does exist in the intermediate state probability. Life in a large number of experience will tell us, is not a A or B, but A and B combination can often produce more ideal effect. For example, in 2000 the negotiating parties in A to increase sales, B would like to increase the sales price, lead to double reverse do not recognize, but a combination of the two may be able to achieve a win-win situation.


祝你成功!望采纳!