who和whose可以平行吗

who和whose可以平行吗
136.Joachim Raff and Giacomo Meyerbeer are examples of the kind of composer who receives popular acclaim while living,often goes into decline after death,and never regains popularity again.
(A) often goes into decline after death,and never regains popularity again
(B) whose reputation declines after death and never regains its status again
(C) but whose reputation declines after death and never regains its former status
(D) who declines in reputation after death and who never regained popularity again
(E) then has declined in reputation after death and never regained popularity
OG11里的,
平行结构不是引导词应该都是一样的吗,where只能与where平行,that只能和that平行,可是这里前面是who,后面是whose,请问这样链接可以吗,有点小纠结
but是平行链接词呀,它前面和后面的成份要平行才对呀,以下是ETS给出的解释
Verb tense + Parallelism
Faulty parallelism in the relative clause who receives ...goes ...regains ...makes it unclear who or what is being described.The original clause begins by describing a certain kind of composer.As written,with who as the subject of goes and regains,the last two descriptions illogically continue to refer to the kind of composer.Logically it must be the reputation that declines after the composer’s death.
C Correct.This sentence presents the proper logic while maintaining parallel structure and consistent verb tense.

who:谁 是疑问代词,可做主语
whose:谁的 是限定词,置于名词前起限定作用,whose+名词才能做主语.
两个词性都不同,不能平行使用.
Joachim Raff and Giacomo Meyerbeer are examples of the kind of composer who receives popular acclaim while living,but whose reputation declines after death and never regains its former status.
约阿希姆拉夫和贾科莫梅耶贝尔是这类作曲家的典型代表,生前颇受好评.但是自他们逝世后,盛名不再,渐渐没落.
but是前后两个分句的转折.连接的是由who和whose引导的两个相反意义的句子成分.而不是单单针对who和whose两个单词.
举个最简单的例子：I will go,but his sister won't.