作业帮英文版《格列佛游记》读后感 1000字左右
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/07/18 21:05:06
英文版《格列佛游记》读后感 1000字左右
不要太多高级词汇啦
急用!好的话
不要太多高级词汇啦
急用!好的话
《格列佛游记》是美国文学史上的一部伟大的讽刺小说,据说伏尔泰、拜伦、高尔基和鲁迅也很推崇斯威夫特的作品.我深深地崇拜着鲁迅,他用枯黄却瘦劲的手指着青年前进的方向,于是我便朝着那个方向,看上了《格列佛游记》--爱屋及乌.但是看过之后,大呼"上当"也于事无补,唯一值得安慰的是可以问问别人对斯威夫特怎么看,来显示自己是"文学青年",更实际地是写一篇不伦不类的读后感交上去凑数.
" Gulliver's travels" is an American history of literature the great irony of the novel, it is said that Voltaire, Byron, and Lu Xun also Golgi a very respected Swift's works. I deeply adore Lu Xun, he was thin and strong fingers youth direction, so I move in that direction, after" Gulliver's travels" - love me. But after reading, shouted"." it doesn't help the situation. Also, the only consolation is that you can ask someone how to look for Swift, to show his" literary youth", actual it is to write a book neither fish nor fowl handed in to make up the numbers.
每当回想起当年看这本名著的时候,历史的沧桑感便涌上了心头,那些日子真是没有成就感受,很失败.一天仅仅十几页,举"目"维艰,冷不防冒上一句"往事不堪回首",发自于肺腑啊!
Each time I think that reading the classics, historical vicissitudes will come back, and the days are no achievement feeling, is a failure. One day just a dozen pages, as "eye" dimension difficult, cold to take a" past cannot bear to think of the past", come from the heart!
打个比方,读《围城》是一种愉悦的享受,就像是用地道战地雷战打鬼子,越打越过瘾,正打在关头上,钱钟书先生将大笔一搁,鬼子投降了；读《骆驼祥子》也挺爽,应该属于三大战役的那种,共军三下五除二地把蒋介石赶到了台湾,我也三下五除二地干掉了老金；但读《格列佛游记》就大不一样了,是一种受罪,就像血战台儿庄一样,拉锯战,特艰苦卓绝,不但要跟斯威特作斗争,还要与瞌睡虫作斗争,不过"不破楼兰终不还"的我还是取得了"格列佛大捷",但损失惨重,至今想起来还余悸不已.
For example, read" Besieged City" is a pleasure to enjoy, like typical battlefield Lei Zhan playing devils, playing more enjoyable, is in the moment, Mr Qian Zhongshu will be a large, devils surrendered; reading" Xiangzi camel" is also quite cool, should belong to the three that battle, the army neat and quick to send Jiang Jieshi arrived in Taiwan, I also neat and quick to get rid of the old gold; but the reading" Gulliver's travels" is different, is a kind of suffering, like the battle of Taierzhuang, battle, especially extremely hard and bitter, not only to fight with sweet, but also with the sleepy bugs to fight, but" not broken Kroraina eventually not also" I was made" Gulliver's victory", but suffered heavy losses, so far I think also fear.
因此,此后,看到鲁迅拿着烟斗一副正气凛然的样子,总会口不自禁地唱道："都是你的错,是你骗了我,还让我不知不觉满足被骗的虚荣"……
Therefore, thereafter, see Lu Xun holding pipe an awe-inspiring righteousness like, always opening up sings:" it's your fault, you lied to me, let me also imperceptibly meet cheated vanity" ... ...
但是,尽管受了骗,并未影响鲁迅在我心的地位,我依然固执地认为：斯威夫特是不能与鲁迅同日而语的.
However, despite being lied to, did not affect the status of Lu Xun in my heart, I still stubbornly believe that: Swift and Lu Xun cannot be mentioned in the same breath is the.
鲁迅,我国伟大的无产阶级文学家、思想家、革命家；斯威夫特何许人也?英国十八世纪罪恶腐朽的资产阶级中的一员.他们的阶级属性有着本质区别（如果赶上"文革"就好了,分清敌我很重要啊）.其二,鲁迅是国产的,斯威夫特是洋货（这好像是废话）.至于第三点,我认为是最最重要的,鲁迅的文章虽艰深生涩但我依稀可辨,斯威夫特的译本虽然都是大白话,但我就是不知所言,所言何干.
Lu Xun, our great proletarian writer, thinker, revolutionary; Swift who? The British eighteenth Century rotten sin asset class. Their class attribute is having substaintial distinction ( if to catch up with the "Cultural Revolution" as well, distinguish between ourselves and the enemy is important. ). Secondly, Lu Xun is domestic, Swift is foreign goods ( which seems to be nonsense. ). As for the third point, I think it is the most important, Lu Xun's article is difficult but I vaguely discernible jerky, the Swift version is written, but I is unintelligible, say what.
经过一番换位思考,我作出如下推测：大不列颠的可爱青年们也必然不知道鲁迅在说些什么,要表达些什么,以及"可能吧--那简直就是一定的"那种鲁迅特色的矛盾句式.
After a transposition thinking, I make the following conjecture: Britain's lovely youth who also will not know in what Lu Xun said, want to express what", as well as possible -- it is certain that Lu Xun" characteristics of the contradictory sentence.他们正如我一样. They like me.
究其原因,彼此在不同的国度,承着不同的文化,对于过去,对于历史,自己的从小就了解,别人的很少去触及.而没有一定的知识垫底,去读这种在特定时期特定环境下的指桑骂槐的作品,看不懂是不足为奇的.
Investigate its reason, each in a different country, the different culture, for the past, for history, his childhood, people seldom go to touch. Without the knowledge base, to read this in a specific period of the specific environment point at one but abuse another work, cannot read is be not at all surprising.
我不知道十八世纪美国的辉格、托利两党缠绵悱恻、暧昧的关系,当然也就无从体会斯威夫特笔下的争论吃鸡蛋应先敲哪头、 鞋跟之高低等"原则"问题的"高跟党"与"低跟党"的妙处.
I don't know the United States in eighteenth Century, the Whig party very sentimental, romantic relationship, certainly will not experience Swift's argument to eat eggs should knock which head, heel of level" principle " of "problem" of high party" and" low with the party "beauty.
我错怪斯威夫特了,我要有一颗宽容的心.而后来的斯威夫特也渐渐变得可以理解了,给我的感觉是他很正义.
I was wrong about Swift, I have a tolerant heart. Later, Swift has gradually become understandable, gave me the feeling that he was justice.
他讽刺地道出了当时英国的特点："贪婪、党争、伪善、无信、残暴、愤怒、疯狂、怨恨、嫉妒、淫欲、阴险和野心."他挖苦地描述了人兽颠倒的怪诞现象：马成了理性的载体,而人则化作脏臭、屎尿横飞、贪婪刁难的下等动物耶胡（yahoo,不是"雅虎"）.他大谈人的天性,就是心甘情愿被金钱所奴役,不是奢侈浪费就是贪得无厌.看完《格列佛游记》之后,我们不能不审视自己,我们身上有没有这些顽疾劣根的影子.
He ironically the then British features:" greed, hypocrisy, party, without the letter, cruel, crazy, resentment, jealousy, anger, lust, sinister and ambitions. " He sarcastically described the animal upside-down paradox: Ma Cheng rational carrier, while others become dirty smelly, urine, greedy for flying vermin Jehu ( Yahoo, not" Yahoo!" ). He discusses the human nature, is to be most willing to be enslaved by money, not extravagance and waste that is be insatiably avaricious. After reading" Gulliver's travels", we must look at ourselves, we who have these illnesses bad root shadow.
有一句话,我认为评论得很经典：以夸张渲染时代的生气,藉荒唐痛斥时代的弊端；在厌恨和悲观背后,应是一种苦涩的忧世情怀.
There is a saying, I think the comment very classic : an exaggerated rendering times angry, absurd to the malpractice by age; in hate and pessimism behind, is a bitter feelings of anxiety.没有想到在那些朴实得如同流水账的大白话游记中竟蕴含着这么深邃的内涵.
Had not thought that in those homely as a running account of travels in the vernacular so profound connotations.我知道,
《格列佛游记》还需要再读上一遍,抑或是更多遍.这应该是以后的事了.
I know," Gulliver's travels" also need to read again, or is it more times. This should be a thing of the future.
" Gulliver's travels" is an American history of literature the great irony of the novel, it is said that Voltaire, Byron, and Lu Xun also Golgi a very respected Swift's works. I deeply adore Lu Xun, he was thin and strong fingers youth direction, so I move in that direction, after" Gulliver's travels" - love me. But after reading, shouted"." it doesn't help the situation. Also, the only consolation is that you can ask someone how to look for Swift, to show his" literary youth", actual it is to write a book neither fish nor fowl handed in to make up the numbers.
每当回想起当年看这本名著的时候,历史的沧桑感便涌上了心头,那些日子真是没有成就感受,很失败.一天仅仅十几页,举"目"维艰,冷不防冒上一句"往事不堪回首",发自于肺腑啊!
Each time I think that reading the classics, historical vicissitudes will come back, and the days are no achievement feeling, is a failure. One day just a dozen pages, as "eye" dimension difficult, cold to take a" past cannot bear to think of the past", come from the heart!
打个比方,读《围城》是一种愉悦的享受,就像是用地道战地雷战打鬼子,越打越过瘾,正打在关头上,钱钟书先生将大笔一搁,鬼子投降了；读《骆驼祥子》也挺爽,应该属于三大战役的那种,共军三下五除二地把蒋介石赶到了台湾,我也三下五除二地干掉了老金；但读《格列佛游记》就大不一样了,是一种受罪,就像血战台儿庄一样,拉锯战,特艰苦卓绝,不但要跟斯威特作斗争,还要与瞌睡虫作斗争,不过"不破楼兰终不还"的我还是取得了"格列佛大捷",但损失惨重,至今想起来还余悸不已.
For example, read" Besieged City" is a pleasure to enjoy, like typical battlefield Lei Zhan playing devils, playing more enjoyable, is in the moment, Mr Qian Zhongshu will be a large, devils surrendered; reading" Xiangzi camel" is also quite cool, should belong to the three that battle, the army neat and quick to send Jiang Jieshi arrived in Taiwan, I also neat and quick to get rid of the old gold; but the reading" Gulliver's travels" is different, is a kind of suffering, like the battle of Taierzhuang, battle, especially extremely hard and bitter, not only to fight with sweet, but also with the sleepy bugs to fight, but" not broken Kroraina eventually not also" I was made" Gulliver's victory", but suffered heavy losses, so far I think also fear.
因此,此后,看到鲁迅拿着烟斗一副正气凛然的样子,总会口不自禁地唱道："都是你的错,是你骗了我,还让我不知不觉满足被骗的虚荣"……
Therefore, thereafter, see Lu Xun holding pipe an awe-inspiring righteousness like, always opening up sings:" it's your fault, you lied to me, let me also imperceptibly meet cheated vanity" ... ...
但是,尽管受了骗,并未影响鲁迅在我心的地位,我依然固执地认为：斯威夫特是不能与鲁迅同日而语的.
However, despite being lied to, did not affect the status of Lu Xun in my heart, I still stubbornly believe that: Swift and Lu Xun cannot be mentioned in the same breath is the.
鲁迅,我国伟大的无产阶级文学家、思想家、革命家；斯威夫特何许人也?英国十八世纪罪恶腐朽的资产阶级中的一员.他们的阶级属性有着本质区别（如果赶上"文革"就好了,分清敌我很重要啊）.其二,鲁迅是国产的,斯威夫特是洋货（这好像是废话）.至于第三点,我认为是最最重要的,鲁迅的文章虽艰深生涩但我依稀可辨,斯威夫特的译本虽然都是大白话,但我就是不知所言,所言何干.
Lu Xun, our great proletarian writer, thinker, revolutionary; Swift who? The British eighteenth Century rotten sin asset class. Their class attribute is having substaintial distinction ( if to catch up with the "Cultural Revolution" as well, distinguish between ourselves and the enemy is important. ). Secondly, Lu Xun is domestic, Swift is foreign goods ( which seems to be nonsense. ). As for the third point, I think it is the most important, Lu Xun's article is difficult but I vaguely discernible jerky, the Swift version is written, but I is unintelligible, say what.
经过一番换位思考,我作出如下推测：大不列颠的可爱青年们也必然不知道鲁迅在说些什么,要表达些什么,以及"可能吧--那简直就是一定的"那种鲁迅特色的矛盾句式.
After a transposition thinking, I make the following conjecture: Britain's lovely youth who also will not know in what Lu Xun said, want to express what", as well as possible -- it is certain that Lu Xun" characteristics of the contradictory sentence.他们正如我一样. They like me.
究其原因,彼此在不同的国度,承着不同的文化,对于过去,对于历史,自己的从小就了解,别人的很少去触及.而没有一定的知识垫底,去读这种在特定时期特定环境下的指桑骂槐的作品,看不懂是不足为奇的.
Investigate its reason, each in a different country, the different culture, for the past, for history, his childhood, people seldom go to touch. Without the knowledge base, to read this in a specific period of the specific environment point at one but abuse another work, cannot read is be not at all surprising.
我不知道十八世纪美国的辉格、托利两党缠绵悱恻、暧昧的关系,当然也就无从体会斯威夫特笔下的争论吃鸡蛋应先敲哪头、 鞋跟之高低等"原则"问题的"高跟党"与"低跟党"的妙处.
I don't know the United States in eighteenth Century, the Whig party very sentimental, romantic relationship, certainly will not experience Swift's argument to eat eggs should knock which head, heel of level" principle " of "problem" of high party" and" low with the party "beauty.
我错怪斯威夫特了,我要有一颗宽容的心.而后来的斯威夫特也渐渐变得可以理解了,给我的感觉是他很正义.
I was wrong about Swift, I have a tolerant heart. Later, Swift has gradually become understandable, gave me the feeling that he was justice.
他讽刺地道出了当时英国的特点："贪婪、党争、伪善、无信、残暴、愤怒、疯狂、怨恨、嫉妒、淫欲、阴险和野心."他挖苦地描述了人兽颠倒的怪诞现象：马成了理性的载体,而人则化作脏臭、屎尿横飞、贪婪刁难的下等动物耶胡（yahoo,不是"雅虎"）.他大谈人的天性,就是心甘情愿被金钱所奴役,不是奢侈浪费就是贪得无厌.看完《格列佛游记》之后,我们不能不审视自己,我们身上有没有这些顽疾劣根的影子.
He ironically the then British features:" greed, hypocrisy, party, without the letter, cruel, crazy, resentment, jealousy, anger, lust, sinister and ambitions. " He sarcastically described the animal upside-down paradox: Ma Cheng rational carrier, while others become dirty smelly, urine, greedy for flying vermin Jehu ( Yahoo, not" Yahoo!" ). He discusses the human nature, is to be most willing to be enslaved by money, not extravagance and waste that is be insatiably avaricious. After reading" Gulliver's travels", we must look at ourselves, we who have these illnesses bad root shadow.
有一句话,我认为评论得很经典：以夸张渲染时代的生气,藉荒唐痛斥时代的弊端；在厌恨和悲观背后,应是一种苦涩的忧世情怀.
There is a saying, I think the comment very classic : an exaggerated rendering times angry, absurd to the malpractice by age; in hate and pessimism behind, is a bitter feelings of anxiety.没有想到在那些朴实得如同流水账的大白话游记中竟蕴含着这么深邃的内涵.
Had not thought that in those homely as a running account of travels in the vernacular so profound connotations.我知道,
《格列佛游记》还需要再读上一遍,抑或是更多遍.这应该是以后的事了.
I know," Gulliver's travels" also need to read again, or is it more times. This should be a thing of the future.