英语翻译外文翻译:谁能帮我找一篇关于苹果国际竞争力的文献,需要英文的,我要做外文翻译,好的话追30分!我说的苹果是农产品
来源:学生作业帮 编辑:作业帮 分类:英语作业 时间:2024/11/07 20:50:20
英语翻译
外文翻译:谁能帮我找一篇关于苹果国际竞争力的文献,需要英文的,我要做外文翻译,好的话追30分!
我说的苹果是农产品的苹果~而且不包括苹果汁,是鲜苹果~fresh apple~不好意思啊~
外文翻译:谁能帮我找一篇关于苹果国际竞争力的文献,需要英文的,我要做外文翻译,好的话追30分!
我说的苹果是农产品的苹果~而且不包括苹果汁,是鲜苹果~fresh apple~不好意思啊~
在那篇文章中所引用了苹果创造人乔布斯的话,我认为那就是苹果的核心竞争力.
乔布斯自己的解释: “iPod为什么存在,苹果公司为什么能在这个行业里获得成功?(答案在于)日本的消费类电子产品公司虽然是卓越的硬件制造商,但他们直到最近才得以开发出所必需的好软件.看看iPod你就会明白,它是一款漂亮的硬件,也是一款便易操作的软件产品.而日本消费类电子产品公司无法实现这种飞跃,创造出那样的软件.这就是苹果公司能在iPod上获得成功的原因所在.在手机上,也是类似的情形.手机制造商们已经解决了硬件问题,但他们无法做好软件.通常的仿造者会努力模仿硬件,这会让他们耗费一些时间.但是我们的软件比目前我们所看到的一切软件都至少先进5年.这一点他们很难超越.” “重要的不是你能实现什么,而是你怎么实现(It's not what you can do, it's how you do it)”.
用户体验不是震撼性创新,而是把众多不被重视的细节做好.乔布斯嘴里所说的领先5年也许有点夸张,但iPhone的最大优势在于用户体验的巨大升级,这一点短时期内恐怕真的很难有对手超越.用过iPod的朋友,请思考一下在iPod之前,是否有mp3播放器能够像iPod这样,操作不到三次就能选择一首想要听的歌曲?对苹果来说,易用性、操作的自然便利程度,不是所谓的卖点,而早已成了产品的灵魂.
同样道理,目前各家的PDA操作方法五花八门,说明书也越来越厚,可苹果意识到,想放大照片就用手指撑开,恐怕是人类现在身体形态下最自然的方法了吧.再比如,以往人们使用语音信箱的方式是一边听话音指示,一边操作手机——在这个应用上,人们的眼睛基本没用上,而且你也只能按照电话留言的顺序一条条全部听完,但在iPhone上,你可以对着屏幕察看留言,然后选择你想听的.
乔布斯还说过一句话,大意是:别问消费者他们想要什么,去创造那些他们需要但表达不出来的.
我个人认为苹果可以发现并有能力满足用户的隐性需求,这就是它的核心竞争力,就是它可以卖得比别人贵但销售量还能卖得比别人火的关键.换句话说就是他们把用户体验做到了极致.再换句现在流行话说,那就是苹果找到了“蓝海”,因为显性需求一般人都能明显发现并满足,但隐性需求是即使你做调查问卷,用户自己也说不出来,等你把东西做出来后,他就是用得爽,说不出具体原因,但就是喜欢,手机行业表面看已经是红海,但苹果却在这当中找到了它的“蓝海”.
其实说到最后还是那句要创新的老话,但中国企业的高层和最高领导,哪有一个像乔布斯一样推进改良和创新的?目前还没见到和听到,如果有人见到有可以分享一下.
In the article cited in the apple create people jobs words, I think it is an apple core competitiveness. Steve jobs himself explanation: "iPod why exist, apple why can achieve success in this industry? (the answer lies in) Japanese consumer electronics company although is excellent hardware manufacturers until recently, but they needed to develop the good software. See iPod you will understand, it is a beautiful hardware, is also a paragraph and easy operation software products. And Japanese consumer electronics company cannot achieve this leap, create that software. This is apple can succeed in iPod. Why your phone, is also similar situation. Cell phone manufacturers have resolved the hardware problems, but they cannot do software. Usually will trying to imitate the imitators hardware, that'll let them take some time. But our software than at present we see everything all at least advanced software for five years. To this point they hardly beyond." "The important thing is not what you can realize, but how do you achieve (It 's not copy, It pains can do ' s how you do It)". The user experience is not shocking innovation, but put many undervalued details well. Jobs said leading five years mouth a bit of an exaggeration, perhaps, but the iPhone is the greatest advantage the huge upgrade user experience that I'm afraid really difficult smalley has opponents transcendence. Used iPod friend, please consider whether there before the iPod, iPod such as mp3 player to less than three times, operation can choose a want to hear songs? For apple, usability, operation, the natural convenient degree, is not a selling point, and had already become product soul. Similarly, the current operating methods of their families PDA is multifarious, manual also more and more thick, but apple realize, want to enlarge photos with his fingers open, be afraid is human body form now the most natural way of it. Another example, before people use voicemail way is to listen to voice instructions, side phone -- in this operation, people's eyes application and basic and useless in accordance with a telephone message you have listened to the order of all season-a, but in the iPhone, you can look to the screen, then select a message you want to hear Jobs also said a word, careless is: don't ask consumers what they want, to create those they need but expression is not out.
I personally think that apple can be found and the ability to meet the user's recessive demand, this is its core competitiveness, is it can sell better than others expensive but sales can sell better than others. The key to fire In other words, they achieved perfection the user experience. Change again, saying, now popular words that apple found "blue ocean", because the dominant demand generally obvious found and meet, but recessive demand is even if you do questionnaire, user myself also said not to come out, when you make something, he is after with song, say a specific reason, but is like, mobile phone industry that surface is the red sea, but apple has found it in the process of "blue ocean". Actually said that last or sentence to innovative old proverb, but China enterprise high-level and the tallest leadership, which have a like Steve jobs as promoting the improvement and innovation? At present does not see and hear, if someone see have can share.
再问: 我说的苹果是农产品的苹果~而且不包括苹果汁,是鲜苹果~ fresh apple~不好意思啊~
再答: 将就点吧,自己修改点,我已经费很大劲了, 望采纳!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
再问: 晕 风马牛不相及~
再答: 求你了,我找了很久,你不要这么无情吧,
乔布斯自己的解释: “iPod为什么存在,苹果公司为什么能在这个行业里获得成功?(答案在于)日本的消费类电子产品公司虽然是卓越的硬件制造商,但他们直到最近才得以开发出所必需的好软件.看看iPod你就会明白,它是一款漂亮的硬件,也是一款便易操作的软件产品.而日本消费类电子产品公司无法实现这种飞跃,创造出那样的软件.这就是苹果公司能在iPod上获得成功的原因所在.在手机上,也是类似的情形.手机制造商们已经解决了硬件问题,但他们无法做好软件.通常的仿造者会努力模仿硬件,这会让他们耗费一些时间.但是我们的软件比目前我们所看到的一切软件都至少先进5年.这一点他们很难超越.” “重要的不是你能实现什么,而是你怎么实现(It's not what you can do, it's how you do it)”.
用户体验不是震撼性创新,而是把众多不被重视的细节做好.乔布斯嘴里所说的领先5年也许有点夸张,但iPhone的最大优势在于用户体验的巨大升级,这一点短时期内恐怕真的很难有对手超越.用过iPod的朋友,请思考一下在iPod之前,是否有mp3播放器能够像iPod这样,操作不到三次就能选择一首想要听的歌曲?对苹果来说,易用性、操作的自然便利程度,不是所谓的卖点,而早已成了产品的灵魂.
同样道理,目前各家的PDA操作方法五花八门,说明书也越来越厚,可苹果意识到,想放大照片就用手指撑开,恐怕是人类现在身体形态下最自然的方法了吧.再比如,以往人们使用语音信箱的方式是一边听话音指示,一边操作手机——在这个应用上,人们的眼睛基本没用上,而且你也只能按照电话留言的顺序一条条全部听完,但在iPhone上,你可以对着屏幕察看留言,然后选择你想听的.
乔布斯还说过一句话,大意是:别问消费者他们想要什么,去创造那些他们需要但表达不出来的.
我个人认为苹果可以发现并有能力满足用户的隐性需求,这就是它的核心竞争力,就是它可以卖得比别人贵但销售量还能卖得比别人火的关键.换句话说就是他们把用户体验做到了极致.再换句现在流行话说,那就是苹果找到了“蓝海”,因为显性需求一般人都能明显发现并满足,但隐性需求是即使你做调查问卷,用户自己也说不出来,等你把东西做出来后,他就是用得爽,说不出具体原因,但就是喜欢,手机行业表面看已经是红海,但苹果却在这当中找到了它的“蓝海”.
其实说到最后还是那句要创新的老话,但中国企业的高层和最高领导,哪有一个像乔布斯一样推进改良和创新的?目前还没见到和听到,如果有人见到有可以分享一下.
In the article cited in the apple create people jobs words, I think it is an apple core competitiveness. Steve jobs himself explanation: "iPod why exist, apple why can achieve success in this industry? (the answer lies in) Japanese consumer electronics company although is excellent hardware manufacturers until recently, but they needed to develop the good software. See iPod you will understand, it is a beautiful hardware, is also a paragraph and easy operation software products. And Japanese consumer electronics company cannot achieve this leap, create that software. This is apple can succeed in iPod. Why your phone, is also similar situation. Cell phone manufacturers have resolved the hardware problems, but they cannot do software. Usually will trying to imitate the imitators hardware, that'll let them take some time. But our software than at present we see everything all at least advanced software for five years. To this point they hardly beyond." "The important thing is not what you can realize, but how do you achieve (It 's not copy, It pains can do ' s how you do It)". The user experience is not shocking innovation, but put many undervalued details well. Jobs said leading five years mouth a bit of an exaggeration, perhaps, but the iPhone is the greatest advantage the huge upgrade user experience that I'm afraid really difficult smalley has opponents transcendence. Used iPod friend, please consider whether there before the iPod, iPod such as mp3 player to less than three times, operation can choose a want to hear songs? For apple, usability, operation, the natural convenient degree, is not a selling point, and had already become product soul. Similarly, the current operating methods of their families PDA is multifarious, manual also more and more thick, but apple realize, want to enlarge photos with his fingers open, be afraid is human body form now the most natural way of it. Another example, before people use voicemail way is to listen to voice instructions, side phone -- in this operation, people's eyes application and basic and useless in accordance with a telephone message you have listened to the order of all season-a, but in the iPhone, you can look to the screen, then select a message you want to hear Jobs also said a word, careless is: don't ask consumers what they want, to create those they need but expression is not out.
I personally think that apple can be found and the ability to meet the user's recessive demand, this is its core competitiveness, is it can sell better than others expensive but sales can sell better than others. The key to fire In other words, they achieved perfection the user experience. Change again, saying, now popular words that apple found "blue ocean", because the dominant demand generally obvious found and meet, but recessive demand is even if you do questionnaire, user myself also said not to come out, when you make something, he is after with song, say a specific reason, but is like, mobile phone industry that surface is the red sea, but apple has found it in the process of "blue ocean". Actually said that last or sentence to innovative old proverb, but China enterprise high-level and the tallest leadership, which have a like Steve jobs as promoting the improvement and innovation? At present does not see and hear, if someone see have can share.
再问: 我说的苹果是农产品的苹果~而且不包括苹果汁,是鲜苹果~ fresh apple~不好意思啊~
再答: 将就点吧,自己修改点,我已经费很大劲了, 望采纳!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
再问: 晕 风马牛不相及~
再答: 求你了,我找了很久,你不要这么无情吧,
英语翻译外文翻译:谁能帮我找一篇关于苹果国际竞争力的文献,需要英文的,我要做外文翻译,好的话追30分!我说的苹果是农产品
英语翻译帮我找一篇关于银行风险管理的外文文献并翻译.翻译成中文后是3000-4000字.找好后会额外加分!
英语翻译由于谢外文翻译,别人的英语实在不敢恭维!遂向诸位求一篇以前字左右的外文文献及其翻译,我要写的是关于快速消费品的渠
英语翻译帮我翻译一篇文章 或者给我一篇关于宣告死亡 或者失踪的外文翻译 英文太多了 弄不上去 就给我找一篇外文翻译好了
求一篇环境会计信息披露的外文文献,要是信息披露的.做外文翻译用,最好是近几年的,可以多给我几篇
英语翻译哪个网站能翻译机械领域的外文文献 要翻译后通顺些的 我本人有外文文献 如果有哪位机械领域的大神能翻译的话 回复我
论文要写旅游服务贸易的国际竞争力,外文翻译在哪里找?
英语翻译我要的是文献,就是在外文数据库中找的那种文章(10页以上)。好的话再追加50分!可以发我的邮箱里:cb1987d
外文文献翻译 请大神帮我把需要翻译的翻译出来
谁能给我一篇关于反倾销的外文文献
需要一篇整合营销对旅游业起到的作用的外文文献,只要外文的就可以,翻译我可以自己来 q990587449
我现在写的论文是中国服务贸易国际竞争力研究,要求一篇3000字英文文献翻译,关于服务贸易就行