作业帮 > 英语 > 作业

英语翻译这是下部分,题目还是Producers and Animal WelfareIs there a sound m

来源:学生作业帮 编辑:作业帮 分类:英语作业 时间:2024/07/03 10:47:40
英语翻译
这是下部分,题目还是Producers and Animal Welfare
Is there a sound moral basis for some of what the welfarists advocate?An increasing
number of people in the general public appear to think that there is.The arguments of
the welfarists appeal to widely shared moral principles.This,we believe,is sufficient
reason for the producers to educate themselves with respect to the moral principles that
under.lie the animal welfarist perspectives.The failure of many producers to do this,up
to the present time,has led many members of the public to perceive the producers as
defenders of their own selfish interests without regard for their moral obligations.
Producers might object to the suggestion that they should educate themselves to
learn of the moral principles that underlie the policy positions taken by the welfarists.
The producers might perceive this suggestion as analogous to the suggestion that they
should modify their personal religious principles.The producers might say that it is not
really education but conversion that is recommended in this suggestion.However,we
believe that this objection on the part of the producers is incorrect.Our suggestion is not
that the producers should make a moral conversion.It is only that they methodically
consider and evaluate the basic moral assumptions of the welfarists.We suspect that if
the producers were to do this,they would find that they shared much common moral
ground with the welfarists.There are important questions to be resolved between the
producers and the welfarists.But,in many cases,these are not questions of basic moral
在中国加入了世界经贸组织后,我国的进出口贸易迅速发展.动物福利壁垒作为一种特殊的非关税壁垒,深深影响着国际贸易的进行.本文介绍了动物福利的概念及背景,分析了动物福利壁垒对世界国际贸易及我国进出口贸易的影响.最后具有针对性地提出了应对动物福利壁垒的加强动物福利推广和宣传、加快动物福利立法的步伐、加强与世界各国的交流和沟通等对策和措施。(麻烦翻译成英文)
动物权利/福利倡导者所倡导的(观念)是不是有合理的伦理基础呢?普通大众中越来越多的人认为是有的.动物福利主义者的观点落脚于我们普遍共有的道德原则.这构成生产者在支撑动物福利主义观点的道德原则方面进行自我教育的充分理由.到目前这止,生产者们做不到这一点,从而导致许多人把生产者看成是为维护自己的私利,而不顾道德义务.生产者可能对学习和了解支撑福利主义者政治立场的道德原则比较排斥;生产者可能把这种学习的建议看成与建议他们改变自己的个人宗教原则类似;生产者可能说这实际不是建议我们学习了解,而是建议我们皈依.但是,我们相信生产者的这种反对是不对的.我们不是建议生产者做出道德的皈依.只是他们对动物福利主义者最根本的道德设想的考虑和评价过于条理性.如果生产者能去了解一下,他们会发现他们与动物福利主义者有着许多共同的道德立场.在生产者与动物福利主义者之间有许多重要的问题要解决.但在许多情况下,都不存在基本道德的问题.