英语翻译不要随便拿google翻译过来的 ASME Code Case 2211 provides the option

英语翻译
不要随便拿google翻译过来的
ASME Code Case 2211 provides the option of overpressure protection by system design in lieu of a pressure relief device,if the user ensures that the MAWP of the vessel is greater than the highest pressure which the system can reasonably be expected to attain.Documentation of the required analysis must bear the signature of the individual in responsible charge of the operation of the vessel.
This Code case provides an alternative to the onerous task of assuring that adequate relief provisions have been made for complex,very rapid and uncertain events.For example,this difficulty is not uncommon for runaway reactions and decompositions.The relief condition is typically unknown territory as far as system behavior is concerned.Defining this behavior can become a major effort.By contrast,the failure(s) that initiate the excursion usually occur in the normal range of operation.In principal,then,protection by system design can have a stronger technology base than protection by emergency pressure relief.The difficulty with the system design option is assuring that all "reasonable" scenarios have been properly considered.
The language of this Code case seems to say that the option of protection by system design must be applied to all potential sources of pressure accumulation in a given vessel.That is,if protection against one possible source of pressure is by system design,protection against all other sources must also be by system design even if only minimal relief provisions would be required.
The complete wording of this Code case is presented in Appendix 2C without further comment.The reader is urged to study this case to be aware of the specific provisions.See Karcher et al.(1997) for a review of this Code case with examples.

美国机械工程师协会规范案例2211提供了由系统设计的超压保护代替卸压装置的选项,如果用户确定容器的最大允许工作压力超过了系统预期达到的最高压力.需要分析的文件必须具备容器操作资格的个人署名.
这个规范为复杂的任务提供了另一种选择,即确保对综合设施、快速不确定事件进行均匀卸压.例如,这种困难对于失控反应和分解并不是少见的.卸压条件通常就系统行为而言是不可知的.定义这种行为可能成为主要的努力.相反的,短程启动失败经常在工作范围内发生.大体上,系统设计保护比紧急卸压系统具备更为强的设计基础.系统设计选项困难在于所有可能的“合理”的情况都被考虑到了.
这个规范案例的文字表明系统设计保护需要适用于所有的给定容器的压力累积势源.那就是说,如果对于一个可能的压力源的保护是通过系统设计来达到的,那么所有的其他压力源都要进行系统保护设计即使是最低卸压要求的也是需要的.
这个规范案例的完整表达在附录2C中,但并没有深入的评论.请读者尽快学习这个案例以确保对于具体规定的了解.对于这个规范案例的回顾请参阅Karcher等（1997）.