作业帮 > 英语 > 作业

英语翻译Third,consideration will be given to what this might mea

来源:学生作业帮 编辑:作业帮 分类:英语作业 时间:2024/07/04 19:39:00
英语翻译
Third,consideration will be given to what this might mean for moral education for a just society,and for China in particular.
MORAL EDUCATION
Humans are uniquely placed to make moral judgements about good and bad,right and wrong,ought and ought not,rights and duties,and the like.This capacity to be moral agents may have its source in a genetically acquired preference standard which allows the infant to prefer one thing rather than another,but becoming a moral agent is something we learn through experience over a long period of time.
Moral education is,minimally,concerned with the acquisition of both personal qualities characterised by the possession of virtues(e.g.,caring,honest,loyal)and the eschewing of vices(e.g.,greed,lust,lying),as Aristotle (1973)held,and understanding how one’s conduct is shaped according to moral principles of a more universal nature.In their book More Than Talk,which was to have a significant impact on the subsequent development of moral education in New Zealand,Snook and McGeorge(1978)identified five principles so central to morality that abandoning them would lead to the collapse of morality altogether:
1.minimise the harm you cause
2.maximise the good you do
3.be fair to all concerned
4.have some concern with truth
5.do not unnecessarily impede others in their pursuits.
Agreeable as these are,I have always thought something is missing–there is no sense of social well-being underscored by a commitment to social justice.And it is to this I now turn.
SOCIAL JUSTICE
Whether or not social justice is a necessary property of being a morally educated person will depend,in part,on what we take social justice to be.In its most basic sense it is about the relationships between groups in nation states in that there are,in some relevant and significant way,differences in their social arrangements such that those most disadvantaged are entitled to appropriate policies and actions which remedy their adverse conditions.
Talk of social justice only gets a purchase when certain conditions prevail.The first requirement is that there be a difference between groups of people.But not all differences are relevant.That some people have black hair and others brown hair is not a difference which warrants intervention in the name of social justice.So,more is required than difference alone.A relevant difference must contain some weighting of one thing over another.But not all differentials prompt a call for social justice.
备注:以下翻译参考,翻译中借助了谷歌的帮助,在此表示感谢!
Third,consideration will be given to what this might mean for moral education for a just society,and for China in particular.
第三,对公正的社会,特别是中国,给予关心和体贴,即可能指德育.
MORAL EDUCATION
德育
Humans are uniquely placed to make moral judgements about good and bad,right and wrong,ought and ought not,rights and duties,and the like.This capacity to be moral agents may have its source in a genetically acquired preference standard which allows the infant to prefer one thing rather than another,but becoming a moral agent is something we learn through experience over a long period of time.
人类是唯一需要做出一些道德方面的判断(的物种):好坏,对错,应该和不该,权利和义务,诸如此类.道德主体的这个能力,也许是有遗传方面的源头,由此获得的偏好标准,会使婴儿在两个事物之间进行比较选择,但是变成一个道德主体,是因为我们经历了长期的经验累积.
Moral education is,minimally,concerned with the acquisition of both personal qualities characterised by the possession of virtues (e.g.,caring,honest,loyal)and the eschewing of vices(e.g.,greed,lust,lying),as Aristotle (1973)held,and understanding how one’s conduct is shaped according to moral principles of a more universal nature.In their book More Than Talk,which was to have a significant impact on the subsequent development of moral education in New Zealand,Snook and McGeorge(1978)identified five principles so central to morality that abandoning them would lead to the collapse of morality altogether:
德育,至少包括,关注个人品质的获得,该个人品质既包括拥有美德(例如:有爱心、正直、忠诚) 和避免恶习(例如:贪婪、好色、说谎),如亚里斯多德主张,并根据(普遍本性的)道德水准,推定一个人的操行是如何塑造形成.在他们的书More Than Talk,对新西兰,后续德育的开发有极其重大的影响.斯努克和麦格鲁吉(1978)识别出对道德非常重要的五条原则,如果放弃这些原则将会导致道德的全部丧失.
1.minimise the harm you cause
2.maximise the good you do
3.be fair to all concerned
4.have some concern with truth
5.do not unnecessarily impede others in their pursuits.
1 缩小自己受到的伤害
2 夸大自己做的好事
3 公平对待
4 关注真理真相
5 无故不干涉别人的追求
Agreeable as these are,I have always thought something is missing–there is no sense of social well-being underscored by a commitment to social justice.And it is to this I now turn.
SOCIAL JUSTICE
上面这些是很容易理解的,我常想会遗漏的一些事情——对会正义的承诺,强调社会福利是没有意义的.这正是我转到的另外一点:
社会公正
Whether or not social justice is a necessary property of being a morally educated person will depend,in part,on what we take social justice to be.In its most basic sense it is about the relationships between groups in nation states in that there are,in some relevant and significant way,differences in their social arrangements such that those most disadvantaged are entitled to appropriate policies and actions which remedy their adverse conditions.
社会公正是否作为德育良好的人的一个必备特性,将部分程度取决于,我们是怎么看待社会公正的.从其最基本的意义上讲,它是有关于民族国家群体之间的关系,在相关和重大的方面,不同的社会安排,使那些最弱势都应当有适当的政策和行动,以纠正其不利条件.
Talk of social justice only gets a purchase when certain conditions prevail.The first requirement is that there be a difference between groups of people.But not all differences are relevant.That some people have black hair and others brown hair is not a difference which warrants intervention in the name of social justice.So,more is required than difference alone.A relevant difference must contain some weighting of one thing over another.But not all differentials prompt a call for social justice.
谈到社会公正,只得以一定条件的购买力为准.第一个要求是人们之间将存在差异.但是并非所有差异都是相关的,有些人长黑色头发和有些人长棕色头发不是一个以社会公正名义干涉的差异.所以,差异并不只是唯一的要求,一个相关联的差异必须囊括人们对物品开销方面的不同,但并非所有的差距促使人们寻求社会正义的呼声.